Re: Regestry Identifiers

["David R. Conrad" <davidc@apnic.net>]

Hi,

Yes, albeit with the proviso if the IRE proto-WG members react
violently to its inclusion, it'll be thrown out.  Given that
it is apparently impossible to find time for a BOF on this issue
in San Jose, I have proposed having the discussion within IRE
as sort of a BOF-within-a-WG...

Regards,
-drc
--------
>Personally I agree with Paul that this is a fine issue.
>
>Was this on the IRE agenda already?
>
>
>  Geoff
>
>
>>I think this is a fine topic for the BoF in San Jose; I would advise
>>anyone, however, to have relevant issues to discuss when they attend,
>>so that we do not have a cacophony of cross-issues.
>>
>>- paul
>>
>>At 10:09 AM 11/17/96 -0800, Rick H. Wesson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>I intend to propose an IETF WG at the San Jose IETF to deal with these matte
rs,
>>>I just want to know if I'm wasteing my time trying to get these consepts
>>>into the IETF.
>>>
>>
>>--
>>Paul Ferguson                                           ||        ||
>>Consulting Engineering                                  ||        ||
>>Herndon, Virginia   USA                                ||||      ||||
>>tel: +1.703.397.5938                               ..:||||||:..:||||||:..
>>e-mail: pferguso@cisco.com                         c i s c o S y s t e m s
>>
>>
>>
>