Re: Conflict resolution?

[George Michaelson <ggm@connect.com.au>]

What do you see as the minimum delay period between a name request and
lodgement that satisfies some kind of dither on fcfs to ensure legitemate
owner concerns can be met? Should there be a minimum hold time, and is
the size of a pool of iTLD admins a function of that time?

What do you see as the maximum time between peer admins of a given iTLD
to re-sync data, such that the iTLD space is in some sense "dirty"? There
definately will be some period of dirtyness in an async world...

What legal (or other) process enforces a party to honour  the requirement
that all iTLD are run as a global common? Given some peoples mail so far,
its reasonable to posit some set of bodies refusing to accept oversight
since they claim its illegitemate in the first place.

Who arbitrates over name removal and contention in any allocation where
one party would be inclined to permit it for a given iTLD and another iTLD
admin interprets policy as excluding the same name?

Apart from that, I think you've come closest to expressing goals here in
an appropriate way: Its not about making money. Its about global win.

-George
--
George Michaelson         |  connect.com.au pty/ltd
Email: ggm@connect.com.au |  c/o AAPT,
Phone: +61 7 3834 9976    |  level 8, the Riverside Centre,
  Fax: +61 7 3834 9908    |  123 Eagle St, Brisbane QLD 4000