Re: free.nic (was_Re: First come/First served)sh ns.eu.org cat .signature

[tor@wtv.net (Bob Allisat)]

According to Jamie:
: Please justify why you cannot be under a second level,
: such as free.nic.net.  Note the intended use of the .net
: domain.


Pierre Beyssac wrote:
>It seems to me that it's not what Bob proposed.
>He was talking about the naming of a _registry_, not about any TLD.
>That registry might run several TLDs. That's all.
>
>Could you give us more information about nic.net? You seem
>to be the owner of this domain, do you deliver subdomains to
>third parties, as you seem to imply by your previous comments?
>http://www.nic.net/ only gives a "No Way" message with a pointer to
>the Internic...

 Oh, I see. Jamie wants the FREENIC
 consortium of non-profit political
 and charitable organizations to become
 clients of his! Sorry Jamie. FREENIC
 will require a lot more than 3rd and
 4th level domain names. And if we're
 not willing to be controlled by NSI
 and Internic we certainly won't be
 under your thumb thank you very much.

 FREENIC sounds like a better and
 better idea the more I think about
 it. It will be a snap to organize.

                             Bob Allisat

   PO Box 191 Station E Toronto Canada M6H 4E2      (416) 588-0670