Re: Conflict resolution?

[root@taka.agn.net (System Administrator)]

> 
> Perry,
> 
> >things. Don't read too much into it. I think the point of the dates
> >was that we want to expeditiously come to closure on this and have a
> >new system in place within a few months.
> 
> There remain several vexing aspects.
> 
...
> 
> 2) Given the non-urgent nature of the matter, but the
> critical long-term implications, why must it occur "within 
> a few months?"  The most trivial Internet protocol would get
> more consideration than this.
> 

(*sigh* - typical big government, bureaucracy-loving, lets-take-
20-years-to-screw-in-a-lightbulb type of attitude...)

Because we have all been waiting for over a year already and are
tired of waiting again. We have money invested in infrastructure
and need to see a ROI. 

We *CAN* invest money in lawyers and courts, but I am confident that
this will not be neccessary. I laud the committee for sticking to its
agressive timetable. They appear to recognize the need for a quick
resolution.

John