[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Conflict resolution?
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 1996 19:07:26 -0500
- From: tor@wtv.net (Bob Allisat)
- Subject: Re: Conflict resolution?
Tony Rutkowski wrote:
> 1) By what authority is this occurring?
> 2) Given the non-urgent nature of the matter, but the
> 3) Given two governmental official public proceedings in the
> 4) What kind of message does this behavior send to the
Dave Crocker replied:
> You have been sending a number of messages along these lines.
>While your questions well might be useful to ask in some forum, this isn't
>it.
>
> The group exists and the group intends to do the work it was asked
>to do. The group was not formed to wait. The group was not formed because
>people felt that the pace should be liesurely. The derivation of the group
>has been well and fully documented. If you or others have concerns about
>that, I encourage you to follow up on those concerns, but not on this list.
>This is a work list. It is not a list for challenging the existance of the
>group or for the group to go through constant efforts at assuaging the
>concerns that you and others might have.
>
> Challenging is a welcome and useful behavior on this list, when it
>pertains to constructive enhancement of proposals being floated on this
>list.
>
> Other challenges are invited to relocate.
Well, Dave, since the IAHC hasn't
been chartered by my Canadian
government nor sanctioned by
any recognized other government
outside of the US - and even that
is under question! - I'd say
challenging IAHC is all we can
legitimately do. I invite you
to relocate to another nation
for a moment, Dave, to gain some
sort of perspective.
IAHC members are invited to hush
up and listen to the natives.
Bob Allisat
PO Box 191 Station E Toronto Canada M6H 4E2 (416) 588-0670