Re: Fw: Re: Shared domains

[chris@hal.iodesign.com (Christopher Ambler)]

>Let's say you are granted exclusivity of .web.  How are we(the
>community) going to guarantee up front that your registry will be
>responsive to the public needs?  What recourse will we have if you are
>not?  You have said time and time again that you should be allowed to
>run your registry as you see fit.  Isn't this what NSI is doing?

These arguments sound as if we would be the ONLY other registry running
beside NSI. This isn't the case. If the public didn't like the way we
run .WEB, they could go to NSI for .COM. If they don't like that, they
can go to the .XXX or .T64 or .BIZ or .CORP or .COOL or .WIRED or .SEX
or .GMBH or .INC or...

If there are concerns about minimal levels of service, then mandate them
in an open procedure. I'm willing to participate and comply.

--
Christopher Ambler
President, Image Online Design, Inc.