Re: Fw: Re: Shared domains

[Aveek Datta <MoNoLiTH+@CMU.EDU>]

Excerpts from newdom: 20-Nov-96 Re: Fw: Re: Shared domains by
Christopher Ambler@hal.i 
> These arguments sound as if we would be the ONLY other registry running
> beside NSI. This isn't the case. If the public didn't like the way we
> run .WEB, they could go to NSI for .COM. If they don't like that, they
> can go to the .XXX or .T64 or .BIZ or .CORP or .COOL or .WIRED or .SEX
> or .GMBH or .INC or...
>  
> If there are concerns about minimal levels of service, then mandate them
> in an open procedure. I'm willing to participate and comply.

That's not the point. Everybody should be able to access every domain
and not be subject to the quirks of one provider. No matter how much you
guys try to downplay it, some TLDs are better than others. They are just
more economically viable to advertise http://monolith.web than
http://monolith.3ng


 Aveek Datta           _ _ _   _                Email: aveek@andrew.cmu.edu
    _ __  ___ _ _  ___| (_) |_| |_     |W|   HomePage:         datta.ml.org
  _| '  \/ _ \ ' \/ _ \ | |  _| ' \ _  |E|    FreeDNS:           www.ml.org
 (_)_|_|_\___/_||_\___/_|_|\__|_||_(_) |B|       Work:      www.itc.cmu.edu
   Please do not CC: mailing list messages/responses to me through email.