[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Shared vs. Exclusive
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1996 11:34:22 -0500 (EST)
- From: Aveek Datta <MoNoLiTH+@CMU.EDU>
- Subject: Re: Shared vs. Exclusive
Excerpts from newdom: 21-Nov-96 Re: Shared vs. Exclusive by Hank
Nussbacher@ibm.net.
> I support the idea and have no money on the line. Reasons:
>
> a) The Shared Top Level Domain Working at Higgs is about a year away from
> completing its draft RFC, having it accepted as an RFC and having
> all the software up and running to have an operational shared TLD. In
> order to eliminate "exclusive' TLDs, Higgs and crew have to complete
> their work. In the interim, we need exclusive TLDs.
Suppose a different group of people gets the shared domain model to work.
Not just theory, but actual implementation. However, these people, not being
domain name squatters, will use a bunch of second level domains. If this was
working and you saw it, would you change your mind?
Aveek Datta
ML.ORG Registry
Aveek Datta _ _ _ _ Email: aveek@andrew.cmu.edu
_ __ ___ _ _ ___| (_) |_| |_ |W| HomePage: datta.ml.org
_| ' \/ _ \ ' \/ _ \ | | _| ' \ _ |E| FreeDNS: www.ml.org
(_)_|_|_\___/_||_\___/_|_|\__|_||_(_) |B| Work: www.itc.cmu.edu
Please do not CC: mailing list messages/responses to me through email.