[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Shared vs. Exclusive



Excerpts from newdom: 21-Nov-96 Re: Shared vs. Exclusive by Hank
Nussbacher@ibm.net. 
> I support the idea and have no money on the line.  Reasons:
>  
> a) The Shared Top Level Domain Working at Higgs is about a year away from
> completing its draft RFC, having it accepted as an RFC and having
> all the software up and running to have an operational shared TLD.  In
> order to eliminate "exclusive' TLDs, Higgs and crew have to complete
> their work.  In the interim, we need exclusive TLDs.

Suppose a different group of people gets the shared domain model to work.
Not just theory, but actual implementation. However, these people, not being
domain name squatters, will use a bunch of second level domains. If this was
working and you saw it, would you change your mind?

Aveek Datta
ML.ORG Registry

 Aveek Datta           _ _ _   _                Email: aveek@andrew.cmu.edu
    _ __  ___ _ _  ___| (_) |_| |_     |W|   HomePage:         datta.ml.org
  _| '  \/ _ \ ' \/ _ \ | |  _| ' \ _  |E|    FreeDNS:           www.ml.org
 (_)_|_|_\___/_||_\___/_|_|\__|_||_(_) |B|       Work:      www.itc.cmu.edu
   Please do not CC: mailing list messages/responses to me through email.