[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Shared vs. Exclusive
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1996 21:16:11 +0200 (IST)
- From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@ibm.net.il>
- Subject: Re: Shared vs. Exclusive
On Thu, 21 Nov 1996, Aveek Datta wrote:
> Excerpts from newdom: 21-Nov-96 Re: Shared vs. Exclusive by Hank
> Nussbacher@ibm.net.
> > I support the idea and have no money on the line. Reasons:
> >
> > a) The Shared Top Level Domain Working at Higgs is about a year away from
> > completing its draftRFC, having it accepted as an RFC and having
> > all the software up and running to have an operational shared TLD. In
> > order to eliminate "exclusive' TLDs, Higgs and crew have to complete
> > their work. In the interim, we need exclusive TLDs.
>
> Suppose a different group of people gets the shared domain model to work.
> Not just theory, but actual implementation. However, these people, not being
> domain name squatters, will use a bunch of second level domains. If this was
> working and you saw it, would you change your mind?
In a second! :-)
>
> Aveek Datta
> ML.ORG Registry
>
> Aveek Datta _ _ _ _ Email: aveek@andrew.cmu.edu
> _ __ ___ _ _ ___| (_) |_| |_ |W| HomePage: datta.ml.org
> _| ' \/ _ \ ' \/ _ \ | | _| ' \ _ |E| FreeDNS: www.ml.org
> (_)_|_|_\___/_||_\___/_|_|\__|_||_(_) |B| Work: www.itc.cmu.edu
> Please do not CC: mailing list messages/responses to me through email.
>
Hank Nussbacher
IAHC member
[the views expressed above belong to the author and do not
necessarily reflect the views of the other IAHC members]