[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why does everyone assume that a registry must be like theInternic?
- Date: Sat, 23 Nov 1996 10:37:50 -0800
- From: Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.com>
- Subject: Re: Why does everyone assume that a registry must be like theInternic?
At 1:20 PM -0500 11/23/96, Aveek Datta wrote:
> Top Level Domain Ownership.
> Can someone OWN the rights to a top level domain? You can own a registry,
> but can you won a top level domain? Or is this public property that must
> be handled as such? And what is handled "as such"? This is issues that
> the IAHC must decide on, and then I bet the courts will make the final
> decision.
>
> I personally believe that top level domains can not be owned; they are
> a public resource. So your argument just doesn't make sense. However,
> there is no clarity on the issue; if TLDs can be owned, then we have
> to deal with all this prior use stuff. If not.... well that would be
> nice, now wouldn't it?
>
Pop quiz:
1. who can and cannot use a TLD named ".COM"?
2. who can and cannot use a TLD named ".IBM"?
Simon
--
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.