[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why does everyone assume that a registry must be like the Internic?
- Date: Sat, 23 Nov 1996 22:13:15 +0200 (IST)
- From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@ibm.net.il>
- Subject: Re: Why does everyone assume that a registry must be like the Internic?
On Sat, 23 Nov 1996, Bob Allisat wrote:
> *HOWEVER* ... I am perfectly willing to
> have multiple partners world-wide such as
> Aveek and his co-workers. They must, however,
> be willing to abide by the terms and conditions
> .FCN or .WTV must present in order to "share"
> in our TLD space and serve our clients in an
> unbiassed manner. For example we will never
> publish names and addresses or phone numbers
> of our registrants - unless authorized to do
> so. This is to protect the privacy of our
> clients. More examples will be provided if
> requested.
How do I go about contacting the sysadmin of ppp121.ca.foo.fcn if
that site just hacked my systems? Or if I see in my logs that
a user on my system has pentrated www.foo.fcn? Which sysadmin
do I contact if it isn't registered anyplace publically?
> Bob Allisat
>
> PO Box 191 Station E Toronto Canada M6H 4E2 (416) 588-0670
>
>
Hank Nussbacher
IAHC member
[the views expressed above belong to the author and do not
necessarily reflect the views of the other IAHC members]