[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: don heath's comments
- Date: Sat, 23 Nov 1996 22:27:37 +0200 (IST)
- From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@ibm.net.il>
- Subject: Re: don heath's comments
On Fri, 22 Nov 1996, Vince Wolodkin wrote:
> Alan Sullivan wrote:
> >
> >
> > As to shared vs. exclusive iTLDs, the technical stuff is easy.
> > Distributed databases exist, they work. The hard stuff here is in
> > people space, not technical space. If iTLDs are shared what is to keep
> > one party fromhoarding all the valuable names? We have not solved the
> > greed problem, and this is inviting it.
> >
>
> Could you explain what you mean, please. If all TLD's are shared, and
> every registry has the same right to sell domains in every TLD, how can
> oneparty hoard names? I think the greed problem is more readily
> apparent in monopoly registries. How are shared registries inviting
> greed??? I just don't get it.
I share with you .xyz iTLD. It is very popular. I have my
partner set up a shell company in the Cayman Islands to register
via me - 20,000 very popular names like pizza.xyz and beer.xyz. I
either charge him nothing or $50 per domain or whatever - it
makes little difference. When a customer comes along that wants
pizza.xyz - it is taken and that registry points the customer to
his shell company that will sell the pizza.xyz domain for $1000.
You - who played fair - have nothing to offer. DN hoarding in
a shared iTLD is very possible unless somehow controlled via contract.
>
> Vince Wolodkin
>
Hank Nussbacher
IAHC member
[the views expressed above belong to the author and do not
necessarily reflect the views of the other IAHC members]