[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: don heath's comments
- Date: Sun, 24 Nov 1996 01:32:07 -0500
- From: Alan Sullivan <sully@frontiernet.net>
- Subject: Re: don heath's comments
>Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 22 Nov 1996, Vince Wolodkin wrote:
>>
>> > Alan Sullivan wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > As to shared vs. exclusive iTLDs, the technical stuff is easy.
>> > > Distributed databases exist, they work. The hard stuff here is in
>> > > people space, not technical space. If iTLDs are shared what is to keep
>> > > one party fromhoarding all the valuable names? We have not solved the
>> > > greed problem, and this is inviting it.
>> > >
>> >
>> > Could you explain what you mean, please. If all TLD's are shared, and
>> > every registry has the same right to sell domains in every TLD, how can
>> > oneparty hoard names? I think the greed problem is more readily
>> > apparent in monopoly registries. How are shared registries inviting
>> > greed??? I just don't get it.
>>
>> I share with you .xyz iTLD. It is very popular. I have my
>> partner set up a shell company in the Cayman Islands to register
>> via me - 20,000 very popular names like pizza.xyz and beer.xyz. I
>> either charge him nothing or $50 per domain or whatever - it
>> makes little difference. When a customer comes along that wants
>> pizza.xyz - it is taken and that registry points the customer to
>> his shell company that will sell the pizza.xyz domain for $1000.
>> You - who played fair - have nothing to offer. DN hoarding in
>> a shared iTLD is very possible unless somehow controlled via contract.
>>
>> >
>> > Vince Wolodkin
>> >
>>
>> Hank Nussbacher
>> IAHC member
>> [the views expressed above belong to the author and do not
>> necessarily reflect the views of the other IAHC members]
HI Hank and Vince,
I agree with Hank, unless we can do something about hoarding, I don't
know how shared iTLDs will be administered fairly. Contract (legal) may
be one means - the problems is which court has jurisdiction on
international legal matters? Wouldn't it be better (as much as I find
the the idea of shared iTLDs intriguing and interesting) to use
structural constructs such as exclusive iTLDs to solve this problem?
Thanks,
Alan Sullivan
Top Domain Registry Inc.