[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Apparent Fraud: Domain Name Survey
- Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 01:15:54 -0500 (EST)
- From: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee@cybercash.com>
- Subject: Apparent Fraud: Domain Name Survey
I suppose there is a small chance that the following is genuine.
But it looks like this guy is spamming all domain name contacts trying to get
info to set himself or his company (PEWC Telecommunications Co. Ltd.) in
the domain name reselling business. Why am I suspicious?
(1) Anything that says "this is not X" has a high probability of being X.
(2) The message was sent from Hong Kong (hkstar.com), not from the ITU.
(3) He got IANA wrong.
(4) It just smells like the kind of questions you would ask if you were
looking for people interested in selling their domain name with a thin
venier of disguise. And then there is the stuff in there about the domain
name "gold rush" how the "study group" has found that all existing domain
name re-sellers overcharge for their services!
(5) It doesn't have lots of other obvious questions you might ask to,
for example, help out the IAHC. Like how many TLDs you think would be
reasonable or if only one more TLD was being created, what should it be,
etc.
(6) Reading this guy's resume at http://home.hkstar.com/~pewc/daniel.html
you find it says "entreprenur" all over it and mentions his ITU address
and that he reads ITU TIES (apparently an ITU publication) but gives
no indication that he currently holds or has even held any position at the
ITU. Yet if he had, I would think it would be prominently listed.
I suspect his guy is just abusing his ITU email address to pass himself off
as an ITU Reseasrch Assistant while abusing the net with unsolicted email to
drum up business and that the ITU and hkstar.com should cancel his accounts
immediately and the ITU look into their policies on opening accounts for
people as name@itu.ch. If the ITU wants to set up mail accounts for
non-official people, maybe it should be name@unofficial.itu.ch or
something... (I'm contacting other parties by direct mail.)
Donald
=====================================================================
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1 508-287-4877(tel) dee@cybercash.com
318 Acton Street +1 508-371-7148(fax) dee@world.std.com
Carlisle, MA 01741 USA +1 703-620-4200(main office, Reston, VA)
http://www.cybercash.com http://www.eff.org/blueribbon.html
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Return-Path: <dchun@mailhub.hkstar.com>
Received: from callandor.cybercash.com (callandor1.cybercash.com) by cybercash.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA26397; Thu, 28 Nov 96 22:45:12 EST
Received: by callandor.cybercash.com; id WAA27808; Thu, 28 Nov 1996 22:41:22 -0500
Received: from mailhub.hkstar.com(202.82.0.38) by callandor.cybercash.com via smap (3.2)
id xma027796; Thu, 28 Nov 96 22:41:15 -0500
Received: from INTERNIX1.DOMAIN (neptune182.hkstar.com [202.82.49.182]) by mailhub.hkstar.com (8.7.5/8.7.5) with SMTP id LAA26429; Fri, 29 Nov 1996 11:19:46 +0800 (HKT)
Message-Id: <199611290319.LAA26429@mailhub.hkstar.com>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <dchun@mail.hkstar.com>
From: daniel.chun@itu.ch
To: "Internet Domain Name Survey" <daniel.chun@itu.ch>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 11:16:24 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Domain Name Survey
Reply-To: daniel.chun@itu.ch
X-Confirm-Reading-To: daniel.chun@itu.ch
X-Pmrqc: 1
Return-Receipt-To: daniel.chun@itu.ch
Priority: normal
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v2.42a)
Nov 29, 1996 Domain Study Group
Dear Domain Owner and Administrator,
This is not a junk e-mail, you receive this e-mail because you have been carefully selected
from InterNIC's WHOIS database to respond to a survey conducted by a voluntary study
group in parallel with various initiatives from bodies including International Telecommunications
Union (ITU), Internet Society (ISOC) and Internet Assigned Numbers Association (IANA).
Due to the phenomenal growth of the Internet, the authorities have acknowledged the high
demand for domain names. In September 1996 alone, InterNIC has received 75,213 applications
for registering for second level domain names including .COM .NET .ORG .GOV and .EDU
In the Internet universe, the gold rush for domain names is happening, there are individuals
speculating domain names and there are various ISPs or individuals involving themselves
in trading and brokering domain names.
Examples of such can be found in the following sites:
www.domainmart.com
www.bestdomain.com
www.domaindealers.com
Our study group has found that typically, these services charges the Domain Owners a
one-time sign up fee of US$10-$100 and then they charge a commission of 5%-25% of
the transaction value of the domain name. This amount could be very high if the domain
name transaction involves high stake (eg. For a sale value of US$25,000 10% commission
will be US$ 2,500). Furthermore, we also observed that the charges for the services provided
are not necessarily equitable to the cost of delivering the service. In another words, the service
delivered for a US$500 transaction and a US$25,000 is the same.
In light of the situation, this study group would like to conduct a survey which require
you to reply to this e-mail.
Please put a cross (eg. X) in the underlined area to indicate your response.
1. Are you one of the following ?
__ Domain owner
__ Domain administrator (eg. technical, billing, administrative contact)
2. Will you offer your Domain for sale ?
__ Yes
__ No
__ Depends on Sale Value
3. What price do you think your Domain is worth ?
__ Priceless
__ USD 0 < P < USD 1,000
__ USD 1,000 < P < USD 5,000
__ USD 5,000 < P < USD 10,000
__ USD 10,000 < P
3) How will you go about selling your Domain ?
__ Through Domain Brokers
__ Personal Selling
__ Directory Services (listing, public forum)
If this study group propose a Directory Service to the authorities to provide a forum,
similar to a database service (eg. InterNIC's WHOIS database) for Domain Names on
non-profit making nature. This will help promote the value of domain names, and promote
growth in the use of domain names and yet indirectly imposing control mechanism to the
brokering of domain names by establishing an open forum. This will promoting the value
of transacting domains without involving in the transaction itself thereby collecting high
commission.
The cost of providing the service will be compensated by a one-time nominal charge to
fund the ongoing research, development and administration of the web site and services.
4. What price level do you as a Domain Owner and Administrator do you
believe is acceptable (For your information, InterNIC currently charges US$ 50
one-time fee for domain registration)
__ US$ 5 - US$ 10
__ US$ 11 - US$ 15
__ US$ 16 - US$ 20
__ US$ 21 - US$ 25
__ US$ 25 - US$ 30
5. What service level do you see as important for this Directory Services
__ Web User Interface and Functionality
__ Bandwidth of the Directory Service
__ Effectiveness of selling your Domain
__ Please suggest _____________________________________
6) Will you be willing to pay by credit card ?
__ Yes
__ No
7) If answer to 6 is Yes, Which method of giving your card details do you prefer ?
__ by Internet email
__ by Internet Commerce
__ by fax
__ by ordinary mail
8) If No, what other methods do you prefer in settling payment for the service?
__ by cheque
__ by wire transfer
__ Others, please suggest ___________________________________
We dearly appreciate you taking time to complete this survey, we will anticipate to
collect most of these responses before Christmas. And we will forward any subsequent
compilation of the survey results probably in January 1997. If there is any other comments,
please forward it to my address at ITU.
Cordially,
Daniel Chun
Research Assistant
Internet: daniel.chun@itu.ch