[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Expansion of the IAHC




Eugene, I replied to you, in private, because I felt that it was
reasonable to give you an answer to your queries but I didn't want to
clog the list any longer. You have seen fit to repost, quoting my
message (which was specifically marked as not to be reposted) in
public. I'm afraid that I will simply not be able to reply to you in
private any longer, either. I am saddened that it is necessary to do
this, but you have made it impossible to do otherwise.

Perry

Eugene Kashpureff writes:
> 
> On Wed, 4 Dec 1996, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> 
> > In any case, the IAHC has representatives from concerned
> > non-governmental organizations like the International
> > Telecommunications Union and the Internet Society. We have a single
> 
> But not the CPSR or DNRC or EFF or VTW or ... the IAHC base could
> have broader acceptance with a broader base ... But these organizations
> weren't included in the IAHC good ol' boys club.
> 
> > quasi-governmental representative from the FNC simply because the FNC
> > has substantial direct input into the processes that have funded
> > internet infrastructure to date and the contracts and cooperative
> > agreements that have provided for that funding. Otherwise, we are a
> 
> So, the US Govt. owns the net, it's not an International resource ?
> 
> > non-governmental organization, like many others that have similar
> > standards involvement.
> 
> Like many others which should have been included in this process too.
> 
> > Perry
> > Speaking for myself, and not for the IAHC in any official capacity
> 
> But you are the IAHC Perry, and it is your duty to weigh my input 
> and Bob's, and Jim's, along with that of others, not to discount it.
> 
> 
> At your name service,
> 
> Eugene Kashpureff, ALTERNIC.NET
> ( no faith in Perry Metzger, little faith in the IAHC )