RE: Expansion of the IAHC

[Michael Dillon <michael@memra.com>]

On Wed, 4 Dec 1996, Simon Higgs wrote:

> Just for the record, Perry has told me in private email, and in no

Private email and "for the record" are two completely different concepts.
You demonstrate your lack of ethics by disclosing this private information 
here in a public forum.

> how he is going to vote. Perry's message below also indicates that this
> whole situation is very inflexible (an Ad Hoc Committee, huh?) and that
> it cannot/will not flex to meet the real issues on behalf of the
> internet community.

Your interpretation of Perry's comments are totally irrelevant.
And your prejudging of the outcome of the IAHC process also indicates
that you have ulterior motives for seeing the process fail.

Quite frankly, nobody can judge IAHC on decisions, proposals, plans
that they have not yet put forward. They have laid out a time frame. They
have invited public input. But until the last day arrives everything is in
flux and the individual opinions of IAHC members are not terribly
relevant.

Michael Dillon                   -               Internet & ISP Consulting
Memra Software Inc.              -                  Fax: +1-604-546-3049
http://www.memra.com             -               E-mail: michael@memra.com