Re: The user viewpoint

["Rick H. Wesson" <wessorh@ar.com>]

On Dec 5,  2:35pm, John R Levine wrote:
> Subject: Re: The user viewpoint
> > Multiple registry control of one branch at ANY level introduces
> > ambiguities which affect business accountability.
>
> People seem to be able to live with the way that 800/888 numbers are
> allocated, with a small neutral database manager holding the shared
> data submitted by all of the IXCs who actually provide the service.
>
> That's the model I believe that most of us fans of shared iTLDs are
> advocating.  It is if anything less risky than the unshared model
> since it lessens the possibility that a registry will unilaterally
> change the rules, as Carl Oppedahl reminds us the Internic does.

And what is to kep the opperator of the shared regestry from doing the
same. Wakeing up one day and changeing the rules, like $50 per allocation
insted of $1?

-Rick


-- 
Rick H. Wesson