Re: Responses to Responses

["Joseph J. Kim" <jokim@server.Berkeley.EDU>]

On Thu, 12 Dec 1996, Net Sales wrote:

> This is Carol the, yes I am a lawyer, lawyer.
> Joseph Kim said in response to the following in my comment:
> 
> >>I wouldn't never presume that
>
> >So in other words you _would_ presume to tell an ISP how to operate. :-).
> >Are you really a lawyer?  I've never met one who was so careless with their
> >grammar.
> 
> Oh, and you have never made a typographical error?  My it must be nice to
> be perfect.

Come on Carol you've got to be able to take what you dish out.  I 
wouldn't have picked on you if you were a little more humane to the guy 
you totally flamed in that last e-mail.

[...] rest of carol's book deleted. 

> And please excuse any typos in the above or refer them to Joseph Kim.
> Thanks.

How about if you agree to be a little more civil to the people on this list
I'll agree not to point out your mistakes. :-). 

Seriously, my personal feeling is that your comments are a good addition to
this list and I like reading your opinions. However, if you seriously think
that you're going to get away with belittling people on this list and not get
flamed in return, think again. 

Maybe you don't realize just how angry some of your statements are... let 
me tell you what you wrote in a recent e-mail:

> You are truly a stupid human being and not at all worth the fuel 
> involved in a flame.  

> What the hell is your problem?

> Marc, you're an idiot.  You are the worst kind of idiot...

... and to think people say lawyers aren't nice people! 

Seriously, let's keep it clean folks and try to promote discussion rather
than squelch it... that was the whole point of my last email. 

-jjk