[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Responses to Responses



Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com> writes:

>> >Would not that be the International Olympic Committee?
>> No.  A US law would not apply to the International Olympic Committee; it
>> covers the US Olympic Committee.
>
>A small point:  US law applies to any organization that conducts
>affairs in the US, international or not, except in some special cases
>for actual representatives of foreign governments.

kent, that's a great argument on why non-lawyers, such as most of us,
should not be trying to deal with trademark law.  your point is precise; my
response wasn't.

my major beef is that this list should accept trademark law (in the
confines of the list) and not try to interpret it or change it; we should
discuss bringing the internet into the connected mid-90's and bring it into
compliance with the law, as well as allow for further grow in a fair and
legal manner.

rick cricow

  ------only two things that money can't buy;
                 one is true love, the other is home-grown tomatoes------
  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
   rick cricow                                        voice:541-484-7323
   net sales                                            fax:541-484-3099
   735 w. 7th ave.                                   orders:800-323-4463
   eugene, or  97402  u.s.a.                   on the web:www.yujean.com
  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *