[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Waiting peroid

At 1:16 AM -0800 12/21/96, Rick H. Wesson wrote:
>I have yet to be convinced that a Lottery process is wize. I saw some language
>in the IAHC draft that states something about "qualified" applicatons. IMHO
>the IAHC should make clear recomendatios on what and what is not qualified,
>and expressly state those qulalifications beyont $20K. I dont care if I'm

	Yes, we do need to formulate the criteria.

	As I mentioned before, the reason for believing a lottery necessary is

a)  the need to do expansion in managemable increments, and
b)  believing that any list of registrar criteria which has reasonably easy
community consensus will not be a sufficient filter to bring the number of
"qualified" applicants low enough.

d/


(read the last line, please)
----------------------------
Dave Crocker, Director                                       +1 408 246 8253
Internet Mail Consortium                                 (f) +1 408 249 6205
127 Segré Place                                             dcrocker@imc.org
Santa Cruz, CA  95060 USA                                 http://www.imc.org

Also:  IAHC member, expressing strictly (or loosely) personal opinions