[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CORE

On Fri, 20 Dec 1996, Rick H. Wesson wrote:

> 
> I'm gald you folks liked the Shared-tld consept. I don't think you understand
> what goes into building such a thing. It takes time, and it has *NEVER*
> been tested on the scale the IAHC is proposeing.

Which is why we will select only 7 new gTLDs and 20-30 new registries.

> 
> There is no mention about the contractor to CORE having time to create this
> technology. There should be some work started NOW so that it could be ready
> by the time this whole thing comes about.
> 
> I am willing to hand over much of the software I have written to date
> to a non-profit that gets the COREcontract. I have done much work on
> evaluateing SQL verses Object Oriented databases with respect
> to a Shared gTLD regestry. Most of this work I have not published.
> 
> I also have quite a bit of tha management software such as X and java
> based clients to the regestry, Template parsers, Queue managers
> and Servers that verify e-mail addresses, and check on lame deligations.
> I've also done quite a bit of work on hacking bind so that it is
> tightly integrated with the regestry. I have written all the above
> in several databases such as Oracle, CORBA, and Versant.
> 
> If you folks think it would be benificial I could write a spec for
> a shared regestry the size and scope you are talking about.
> 
> -Rick
> 
> 
> -- 
> Rick H. Wesson
> 

Hank Nussbacher
IAHC member
[the views expressed above belong to the author and do not
necessarily reflect the views of the other IAHC members]