[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lottery
- Date: Sat, 21 Dec 1996 21:01:36 +0200 (IST)
- From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@ibm.net.il>
- Subject: Re: lottery
On Fri, 20 Dec 1996, Christopher Ambler wrote:
A number of people have commented about the lottery. Here is the text
from the draft:
----------
The selection of registries in a region will be by lottery among qualified
applicants. Registrar rights are non-transferable
to other entities.
IAHC will establish the qualifications required of each applicant to
become a registrar. These qualifications will be
objective and will be subject to independent confirmation. The application
forms for Registrars will be prepared by IAHC,
and will include the following provisions:
--------
It was never the intention to cripple qualified companies. Here is your
chance to help us determine what are the qualifications to look for:
technical and financial.
> The main problem I have with the draft, and the ultimate breaker for me is
> the lottery. Combined with the requirement that there be equal numbers from
> all the regions, this lottery will serve no purpose other than to exclude
> technically competant registries from participating.
>
> There are a number of individuals and companies which have been participating
> in this process since day one, and the odds are that the lottery will exclude
> them for this first year. This is completely unacceptable.
>
> I would propose that the draft immediately be changed as such:
>
> For the first year, anyone who meets the technical requirements will be
> granted a license.
>
> For all other years, perhaps a lottery will work, if neccesary.
>
> This solution will either work or it will not. The number of registries is
> irrelevant to the viability of the technical solution. The lottery is simply
> an artificial barrier to participation that should be removed at once. There
> is no reason that all who can participate should not be allowed to participate.
>
> If this lottery is removed, it is the opinion of our board that it will go a
> long way in winning the approval of Image Online Design.
> --
> Christopher Ambler
> President, Image Online Design, Inc.
>
Hank Nussbacher
IAHC member
[the views expressed above belong to the author and do not
necessarily reflect the views of the other IAHC members]
- References:
- lottery
- From: Christopher Ambler <chris@iodesign.com>