[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 60 day waiting peroid.
- Date: Sat, 21 Dec 1996 19:00:40 -0500
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Subject: Re: 60 day waiting peroid.
Karl Denninger writes:
> > Karl Denninger writes:
> > > Again, where do these people get the gall to claim they are a tribunal in
> > > *ANY* form?
> >
> > Who is claiming they are a tribunal?
>
> Baloney. The IAHC is attempting to take actions and adjudicate disputes
Could you name the dispute the IAHC is adjudicating?
To adjudicate a dispute, two disputant parties have to appear before
you by some process. Could you enlighten us as to whom the disputants
are?
> > The IAHC makes no such claim. As for registrars, we have no desire to
> > see them adjudicating disputes. See the document for details.
>
> No, but you'll set up a process which preempts the REAL judicial process of
> a given jurisdiction from operating as it is supposed to.
How? Our document implies that disputes are handled by the courts,
not by the registrars or by the IAHC. Are you arguing that the courts
are not the "REAL" judicial process? Could you explain what the
adjudication process that "preempts" the courts that we are setting up
is?
Perry
Speaking for myself, not the IAHC