[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 60 day waiting peroid.



> 
> 
> Karl Denninger writes:
> > > Karl Denninger writes:
> > > > Again, where do these people get the gall to claim they are a tribunal in
> > > > *ANY* form?
> > > 
> > > Who is claiming they are a tribunal?
> > 
> > Baloney.  The IAHC is attempting to take actions and adjudicate disputes
> 
> Could you name the dispute the IAHC is adjudicating?
> 
> To adjudicate a dispute, two disputant parties have to appear before
> you by some process. Could you enlighten us as to whom the disputants
> are?
> 
> > > The IAHC makes no such claim. As for registrars, we have no desire to
> > > see them adjudicating disputes. See the document for details.
> > 
> > No, but you'll set up a process which preempts the REAL judicial process of
> > a given jurisdiction from operating as it is supposed to.
> 
> How?  Our document implies that disputes are handled by the courts,
> not by the registrars or by the IAHC.  Are you arguing that the courts
> are not the "REAL" judicial process? Could you explain what the
> adjudication process that "preempts" the courts that we are setting up
> is?
> 
> Perry
> Speaking for myself, not the IAHC

What do you call holding up a business for 60 days on the MINISCULE
possibility that someone MIGHT object?

Oh, that's not a dispute.... yet.  Until the registry and/or all the IAHC
members find themselves adjudicating restraint of trade.  

As defendants.

--
-- 
Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.Net)| MCSNet - The Finest Internet Connectivity
http://www.mcs.net/~karl     | T1's from $600 monthly to FULL DS-3 Service
			     | 33 Analog Prefixes, 65 ISDN, Web servers $75/mo
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| Email to "info@mcs.net" WWW: http://www.mcs.net/
Fax:   [+1 312 248-9865]     | 2 FULL DS-3 Internet links; 400Mbps B/W Internal