[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 60 day waiting peroid.
- Date: Sat, 21 Dec 1996 21:27:03 -0600 (CST)
- From: Karl Denninger <karl@Mcs.Net>
- Subject: Re: 60 day waiting peroid.
>
>
> Karl Denninger writes:
> > > Karl Denninger writes:
> > > > Again, where do these people get the gall to claim they are a tribunal in
> > > > *ANY* form?
> > >
> > > Who is claiming they are a tribunal?
> >
> > Baloney. The IAHC is attempting to take actions and adjudicate disputes
>
> Could you name the dispute the IAHC is adjudicating?
>
> To adjudicate a dispute, two disputant parties have to appear before
> you by some process. Could you enlighten us as to whom the disputants
> are?
>
> > > The IAHC makes no such claim. As for registrars, we have no desire to
> > > see them adjudicating disputes. See the document for details.
> >
> > No, but you'll set up a process which preempts the REAL judicial process of
> > a given jurisdiction from operating as it is supposed to.
>
> How? Our document implies that disputes are handled by the courts,
> not by the registrars or by the IAHC. Are you arguing that the courts
> are not the "REAL" judicial process? Could you explain what the
> adjudication process that "preempts" the courts that we are setting up
> is?
>
> Perry
> Speaking for myself, not the IAHC
What do you call holding up a business for 60 days on the MINISCULE
possibility that someone MIGHT object?
Oh, that's not a dispute.... yet. Until the registry and/or all the IAHC
members find themselves adjudicating restraint of trade.
As defendants.
--
--
Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.Net)| MCSNet - The Finest Internet Connectivity
http://www.mcs.net/~karl | T1's from $600 monthly to FULL DS-3 Service
| 33 Analog Prefixes, 65 ISDN, Web servers $75/mo
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| Email to "info@mcs.net" WWW: http://www.mcs.net/
Fax: [+1 312 248-9865] | 2 FULL DS-3 Internet links; 400Mbps B/W Internal