Re: Dispute resolution

[Karl Denninger <karl@Mcs.Net>]

> > Firms have a *right* to pursue legal redress for violations of their
> > rights in this country through the courts.  Its not an *option* -- its
> > a RIGHT.
> 
>    Not everyone agrees that "firms" have "rights", Karl -- although
> individuals certainly have rights.
> 
>    Furthermore, many kinds of disputes may _not_ be pursued in U.S.
> courts.
> 
>    The IAHC is charged with defining a process for new gTLDs. IMHO,
> that should include a process for dispute resolution. The IAHC _cannot_
> refer inter-national disputes to U.S. courts, no matter how much Karl
> whines about it.
> 
> --
> John Leslie <john@jlc.net>

Nonetheless, the IAHC cannot usurp the rights of other national legal
systems, no matter how much John whines about it either!

Trying to do this with bodies comprised of Americans, on American soil, at
meetings held in the US, is asking for major *criminal* legal trouble.

--
-- 
Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.Net)| MCSNet - The Finest Internet Connectivity
http://www.mcs.net/~karl     | T1's from $600 monthly to FULL DS-3 Service
			     | 33 Analog Prefixes, 65 ISDN, Web servers $75/mo
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| Email to "info@mcs.net" WWW: http://www.mcs.net/
Fax:   [+1 312 248-9865]     | 2 FULL DS-3 Internet links; 400Mbps B/W Internal