[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Trademarks, random strings, sharing, reserved words
- Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 23:24:39 -0800 (PST)
- From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
- Subject: Re: Trademarks, random strings, sharing, reserved words
Peter Mott allegedly said:
>
> Our definition of infringe means:-
>
> 1. An attempt to sell the name to another entity for any reason, except as
> part of a business which is a going concern. This would prevent situations
> we had here in New Zealand where somebody registered a whole heap of names
> and attempted to "sell them" to companies owning trademarks which included
> the names. Details at http://www.registry.net.nz/info/
>
> 2. The domain name being used to promote a business activity which is
> infringing upon anothers rights, protected by a trademark, servicemark, or
> any other right granted by the law of the land.
>
> We think it is the responsibility of the applicant to *agree* that the wont
> attempt to do the first, and *certify* that they have taken **all
> reasonable steps** to ensure the second does not occur now or at any time
> in the future.
>
> If another party feels a domain holder is infringing upon their rights,
> then they can seek normal legal remedies.
>
> Peter Mott
> Director
This seems like a really clean way to limit various kinds of name
hoarding and extortion. Does it work?
--
Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited",
kent@songbird.com,kc@llnl.gov the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint: 5A 16 DA 04 31 33 40 1E 87 DA 29 02 97 A3 46 2F