[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Exclusive License
- Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 17:46:54 +0100
- From: werner@axone.ch (Werner Staub)
- Subject: Re: Exclusive License
David,
> If I'm a lawyer, and register my trade name in .law, would
> I not object strongly to someone registering the same name
> in .legal?
Sure, if the .law and .legal domain names turned out to
be similar.
But that is _highly_ unlikely. Domain names inevitably
develop their own characteristics, either as a matter
of policy or just because that is a law of nature.
Competitors never compete on an equal-to-equal basis.
They always try to be different, or use the fact that
they already are. Just what exactly they do to be
different depends on which of their - intended or
accidental - characteristics prove successful.
For .law and .legal this may mean, for instance, that
.law manages to get bigger law firms wheras .legal
ends up registering individual lawyers and publishers
of legal litterature.
Or, more logically still, one registry will subject its
domain to yet_another_exclusive_contract: a deal
with a professional association. Associations are
typically vested with some degree of self-regulatory
powers. It would seem obvious that association demand
control over the domain in exchange for the marketing
leverage it provides.
Whatever the ultimate (and most probably monopolistic)
result, it is certainly a good thing if a a potential
challenger is around.
In other words, we need (and we get) is a blend of
monopoly and competition. That is nothing new: it is
precisely brands are about. And a top level domain is
a brand of brands.
Regards,
Werner
--
Email: werner@axone.ch
Tel +41 22 8200074 Fax +41 22 8200073
http://www.axone.ch http://Finance.Wat.ch