Re: CORE

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

Dave Crocker allegedly said:
> 
> At 2:50 AM -0800 12/23/96, Kevin Brown wrote:
> >I would be interested in you doing this..ie a spec for a shared registry
> >database...
> 
> 	As has been noted, the clock is ticking and the IAHC draft
> specifies quite a bit of detail to be decided by CORE.  Since CORE gets
> formed roughly in March, a) there's quite a bit of time between now and
> then which could be used for discussing the topics on its 'formation'
> agenda, and b) having some background discussion when it starts might
> shorten the time before it is able to set up shop.  E.g., since operation
> of the new gTLD registrars is dependent upon CORE's decisions about a
> shared repository, trying to help it make decisions quickly would be a Good
> Thing.
> 
> 	If folks are interested, we can establish an iahc-core mailing
> list, devoted to discussing matters relevant to the formation and operation
> of CORE.
> 
> 	The major caveat which must be kept in mind is that nothing in any
> of the discussions will be binding upon CORE.  The material from the
> discussion will be available as input to the CORE Board of Trustees, to use
> however it sees fit.
> 
> 	Interested?

Dave, I have indicated in a prior mail message that I think that the
basic structure and charter of CORE should be rethought because there
is no effective oversight.  Is the IAHC's mind completely closed on
this topic?

-- 
Kent Crispin				"No reason to get excited",
kent@songbird.com,kc@llnl.gov		the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint:   5A 16 DA 04 31 33 40 1E  87 DA 29 02 97 A3 46 2F