[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Congradulations

chris@hal.iodesign.com (Christopher Ambler) writes:

> It neglects to take into account prior use in this issue.

   It gives it all the mention it deserves.

> It neglects to take responsibility for the promises of IANA.

   It makes no mention of preliminary IANA ideas which it supersedes.

> It neglects to make any requirements of NSI, instead, it "recommends"
>   courses of action to NSI while holding new registries to these
>   requirements.

   It recognizes that NSI currently has a contract not under control
of the IAHC.

- James Gritton
  jamie@gritton.org