[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Monopoly/Ologopoly
- Date: Tue, 24 Dec 1996 11:16:41 -0500
- From: Alan Sullivan <sully@frontiernet.net>
- Subject: Re: Monopoly/Ologopoly
Christopher Ambler wrote:
>
> >Quoting the document:
> >
> > These new gTLD's will consist of letter strings of three to
> > five letters each. IAHC has also decided that each gTLD
> > should have general, contextual meaning, i.e. the gTLD
> > should suggest a connection with the Internet, with business
> > or with personal uses.
> >
> >My personal judgement is that .MEDICAL doesn't fit the criteria in
> >several respects.
>
> Why is the IAHC choosing the new gTLDs in the first place? This makes
> no sense in that they have no financial stake in those gTLDs. The
> registrars are the ones who will have to develop, market and sell
> the gTLDs, shouldn't the registrars select them?
>
> Frankly, and I believe I speak for many, the IAHC is allocating
> MUCH TOO MUCH decision-making and power to itself. Scale this back
> a bit. The IAHC is supposed to decide the POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
> for this, not make business decisions and selections for the registrars.
>
> --
> Christopher Ambler
> President, Image Online Design, Inc.
Hi Christopher,
Yes IAHC is allocating too much decision making to themselves, but this
is a consequence of going down the shared registries path.
Thanks,
Alan
--
Alan Sullivan
President
Top Domain Registry Inc.