Re: Thread 2: 60-day issue

[durrell@innocence.com (Bryant Durrell)]

Christopher Ambler writes:
> I see this as a simple statement that there is no waiting period for
> activation in the DNS, but that there is a 60-day puublication
> period, during which applicants should expect any disuptes due to
> trademark issues. The resolution, nor any forced waiting period,
> should not be put upon the registrar, but upon the registrant.

That makes a lot of sense.

I'm curious (perhaps I missed the answer to this, in which case I 
apologize) as to the reasoning behind this clause.  Is it intended
to make sure that all trademark issues are resolved before the domain
goes into serious use, or is it intended to give domain owners a bit
of protection, or what?

-- 
Bryant Durrell (sysadmin, cynic, coyote) | "well, it seems doable so we should
durrell@innocence.com / durrell@bofh.net |  do it.  if we can't then we should
http://www.innocence.com/~durrell        |  get no biscuits."  -- tim@meer.net