Re: Thread 3: selection of registrars

[Eugene Kashpureff <ekashp@alternic.net>]

On Tue, 24 Dec 1996, Christopher Ambler wrote:

> This seems to be a large point of contention. Some like the lottery,
> and some don't. The argument for a lottery is that we need to limit
> the initial participation.

With shared registries, it'll already be limited participation. 

Just how many folks are anxious to line up to pay that 20K to get
in on a mess like this ? Most of the *serious* potential registry
operators I know say it's all bull%^&*.

They'll be lucky to get 20 aplicants.


At your name service,

Eugene Kashpureff, ALTERNIC.NET