Re: Thread 1: Sharing

[Steve Peterson <stevep@ry.com>]

At 11:12 AM 12/24/96 PST, Christopher Ambler wrote:
>>1)	FCFS recognition for EXISTING registries (again, ALL of them,
>>	IANA-recognized or not) in the order which they ACTUALLY went 
>>	constructively online.
>
>While I am naturally in favour of this, there has been some dissention.
>Can anyone give a reason why this is unfair? Please do say that what
>the current registries are doing is 'rogue' or 'unrecognizable,' since
>that's an opinion that is contested. Why, in objective terms, would
>it be unfair to allow those registries who have demonstrated a working
>system to be given recognition in the selection of registrars?

Because no one has shown how granting monopolies in gTLDs best serves DN
users over competing proposals.
--
Steve Peterson                                    Reality Interactive, Inc.
stevep@ry.com
--
Check out http://www.realtools.com for info on CD-ROM training for ISO 9000,
QS-9000 and ISO 14000.
--