[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Revised Draft
- Date: Tue, 24 Dec 1996 13:00:39 -0800 (PST)
- From: Eugene Kashpureff <ekashp@alternic.net>
- Subject: Re: Revised Draft
The problem here Perry is that we, the public, aren't getting
any ongoing feedback from the committee, similar to how this
draft itself evolved without two-way communication.
It's one thing for the committee to solicit input, and another
for the members to let us know how it is responded to...
The '19th' draft is the only statement we've gotten to see ...
... will we see an evolving draft here, or will the only feedback
be when you exhaulted ones issue your final decree ?
The process is *badly* flawed here ...
At your name service,
Eugene Kashpureff, ALTERNIC.NET