Re: Revised Draft

[Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.com>]

At 3:26 PM -0500 12/24/96, Perry E. Metzger wrote:

> 2) There really isn't a benefit to having comment on a divergent document
>    from the IAHC document, because the document being worked from is
>    the IAHC document.  There are lots of groups that have received
>    requests for comments, including a number of governmental agencies
>    around the world and others. They are going to be commenting on the
>    IAHC document, and it is almost certain that any changes that occur
>    are going to be based on the IAHC document. Keep in mind that a
>    minority of those submitting comments are on this list.

Where are the comments from these other organizations going to be
posted? I assume this is still an open public process?

> 5) Finally, for purposes of creating its final document, the IAHC
>    already has a document editor. Given the number of sources of input
>    the IAHC is receiving, it is unlikely that any document generated
>    could be the basis for the final IAHC text, so there isn't much
>    point in producing a "finished" text for the IAHC to consume.
>

Who is the document editor?

Regards,

Simon

--
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.