Re: Thread 2: 60-day issue

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

Carl Oppedahl allegedly said:
> 
[...]
> So under your proposal, what is different about the time before and after
> the 60-day period ends?  It seems that someone with a gripe can sue before
> or after that date.  And it seems that the domain name is active before and
> after that date.  So what is the significance of that date, under your
> proposal?

The significance of the 60 days is that during that time the new
domain name is published in a public forum with the explicit purpose
of informing parties concerned about trademark issues.  That forum
will presumably be a web site with good search facilities.  After the
60 days it is no longer listed at the web site.

-- 
Kent Crispin				"No reason to get excited",
kent@songbird.com,kc@llnl.gov		the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint:   5A 16 DA 04 31 33 40 1E  87 DA 29 02 97 A3 46 2F