Re: Thread 2: 60-day issue

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Leo,

  Well I do agree with this general breakdown of responsibilities
wit respect to CORE, if and when it ever exists as an enitity. But
that does not justify the 60 day waiting period.  

Regards,


Leo Smith wrote:
> 
> Hi Joe...
> You wrote
> : I have not heard any solid arguments from Karl or Kent or Chris or
> : anyone else against the 60-day period why it will restrain the average
> : business.
> The 60 day period establishes a role for CORE (and IAHC) to serve in
> protecting the interests of third party users. The underlying assumption is
> that there is a critical need for some intervention by CORE (IAHC)  to
> reduce trademark problems.
> The function of CORE should be to facilitate registration of domain names.
> Why get involved in the problem solving? Leave it to the courts to
> adjudicate conflicts. Registry responsibility could be as simple as
> assigning registrations on a FCFS basis, with compulsory removal available
> only upon an order from a court of proper jurisdiction.

-- 
Jeffrey A. Williams
DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng.
Information Eng. Group. 
Phone :972-447-1878
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com