[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Specific Questions
- Date: Fri, 27 Dec 1996 12:12:45 +0200 (IST)
- From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@ibm.net.il>
- Subject: Re: Specific Questions
On Thu, 26 Dec 1996, Karl Denninger wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Dec 1996, Karl Denninger wrote:
> >
> > > I can easily equip an office of 20 people with LAPTOPS up to this job for
> > > under $3,000 per person. That's $60K.
> >
> > And what is your hourly rate and how long will it take you to complete the
> > job including installing the ISDN connections in Israel, Japan,
> > Switzerland and Australia not to mention 5 US cities? If you were willing
> > to donate this equipment and services then you should have spoken up
> > months ago.
>
> Why should I? Everyone ELSE is doing this and being reimbursed.....
>
> Oh, I get it. I should donate my time and expertise, not to mention
> hardware, while everyone else gets paid. Bite me.
For the causal reader who may not read every posting of the 250+ per day
I do not get paid nor does anyone else on the IAHC. In fact, I currently
lost about 50 billable hours in December.
>
> > > But $400,000 worth of expensive? You only get THAT by paying people's
> > >conference call bills and airline tickets.
> >
> > You are now mixing Apples and Oranges. Prior to this we were discussing
> > the operation of the IAHC itself which is mainly meetings and discussions.
> > You are now moving into the selection procedure for qualified registries
> > which is wuite different. At that stage it will require an office with a
> > staff of at least one person. It will require paying an internationally
> > reputable accounting firm to check out applicants in whatever country they
> >may originate and to certify that the lottery is properly conducted. It
> > will require a competent international law firm to draw up contracts that
> > will be acceptable in all countries which registry applicants come from.
>
> .....
>
> In other words, we draft a document that radically increases costs, we
> implement it in the most costly fashion, we design a process that is
> inherently expensive, and then we bill the users.
>
> Even though all of these things could have been avoided.
>
> People should IMHO say "bite me" to that process as well.
>
> > The whole CORE process and database will need to be set up which requires
> > six servers to be set up with the database software and a team of
> > programmers to be hired to implement the registry application and verify
> > it's correctness and the ability to properly failover. These servers then
> > have to be deployed in pairs to three different colo sites that are both
> > geographically and topologically distributed.
>
> Again, that's a result of a flawed process which was DESIGNED to be
> expensive.
>
> > > There are less expensive ways to do this.
> >
> > Sure there are. But the users of the Internet don't want to use a network
> > that's held together with string and sealing wax. That's why the thousands
> > of miles of barbed wire in North America aren't being used to carry IP
> > traffic even though they are cheap.
>
> Oh really? You mean like the existing root server infrastructure?
>
> --
> --
> Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.Net)| MCSNet - The Finest Internet Connectivity
> http://www.mcs.net/~karl | T1's from $600 monthly to FULL DS-3 Service
> | 99 Analog numbers, 77 ISDN, Web servers $75/mo
> Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| Email to "info@mcs.net" WWW: http://www.mcs.net/
> Fax: [+1 312 248-9865] | 2FULL DS-3 Internet links; 400Mbps B/W Internal
>
Hank Nussbacher
IAHC member
[the views expressed above belong to the author and do not
necessarily reflect the views of the other IAHC members]