[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thread 2: 60-day issue
- Date: Fri, 27 Dec 1996 03:18:06 -0800 (PST)
- From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
- Subject: Re: Thread 2: 60-day issue
Joe Kelsey allegedly said:
>
> Simon Higgs writes:
> > > The difference is that a DBA applies to a LOCAL business and is granted
> > > by a STATE government of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. You are trying to
> > > take a local law and apply it internationally. If you insist on using
> > > DBA as an example of an instant domain name, then your DBA will have to
> > > be at least a 4LD: <dba>.com.<state>.us. (or maybe <dba>.com.us, but a
> > > corporation still has to register *within* a state, so I don't really
> > > see .com.us as happening any time soon.) Nothing else makes sense as an
> > > *instant* domain name.
> > >
> >
> > DBA is an example, not a direct mapping. DBA's are issued just like
> > domain names are right now. You apply, and can immediately use the
> > name. All a domain name is is an internet DBA mapped to a particular IP
> > address.
>
> But you fail to see the difference. A DBA is granted by a *local* state
> government and applies to doing business in the state you applied. It
> has no relevance globally. If you want to do business globally (or even
> nationally), then incorporate. Thus, an instant domain which is
> *exactly* similar to DBA is a 3LD or a geographic name.
Don't be silly. Of course he sees the difference. It's just not an
important difference. In fact, it's a meaningless difference you
seem to have fixated on.
It is not necessary to incorporate to have a trademark, or to do
business internationally. So a DBA applies. Songbird is a trademark
I own. Songbird is not a corporation.
--
Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited",
kent@songbird.com,kc@llnl.gov the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint: 5A 16 DA 04 31 33 40 1E 87 DA 29 02 97 A3 46 2F