Re: NSI-style "on hold" within 60 days?

[werner@axone.ch (Werner Staub)]

Jeff,

>   I believe that it is clear that a 60 day waiting period
> has no sound basis for inactment, either on a trial basis or
> otherwise.  So, now we need to move on.  What is reasonable
> and prudent time span.  I think 10 days is adaquate, so that
> is my possition.

I also prefer waiting for 10 days to waiting for 60 days.
But my preference would still be _no_ waiting period at all. 

But the method should be specific to the domain. A 
".tm" gTLD (which will hopefully replace the .tm.int proposal)
could be associated with a trial or even a waiting period, 
while a more specific gTLD like ".movie" might have
a shorter one or none at all.

Werner


-- 
Email: werner@axone.ch 
Tel +41 22 8200074 Fax +41 22 8200073
http://www.axone.ch http://Finance.Wat.ch