Re: A position paper

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Daniel,

  Yes, this is true.  But that is a nuance.  It would seem
to me that we should be difinitive in any possition that
is taken, and especially in the Final draft to be excepted.

  More inclusiveness in the decision making process would
also seem a good idea from folks on this list whom are
participating.   

Daniel Kaplan wrote:
> 
> (sorry Jeff and others for the flow of messages. I have to work in batch
> mode, mainly because of the time difference)
> 
 -snip-

> >  Well, than I am confused.  You first state that "Stringent Rules"
> >(Charter) should be impossed.  Than you say they should not due to the
> >generic nature or aspect of gTLDs.  Which is it?  Can't have it both
> >ways!  In your "Rules" you set forth in your position paper, there
> >are two that have already been greatly debated already, and I doubt
> >will be adopted.  Those are Price or profit cap, and administration
> >and sharing.  If by "Sharing" you mean Shared TLDs.
> Rules can be stringent on some aspects (such as the ones we set forth)
> and not on others. And yes, I mean shared TLDs.
> 
Regards,

-- 
Jeffrey A. Williams
DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng.
Information Eng. Group. 
Phone :972-447-1878
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com