Re: consensus and the 60-day issue

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Scott,

  Well directly, I would agree.  However it is implied in the draft
in sections 4.2, 6.0 and 6.1.  In addition no VALID justification
under US law or International Law provides for a 60 day waiting 
period as incumbent on TM's or TLD's to my knowledge.  This may
be due to several obvious reasons, which I will not go into here.

  I fail to see your point, Scott in your comment to my persistance,
unless it is a just frustration on your part to my persistance.
If so, good!  I will continue to be so, until there is a working
Draft that can be considered a reasonable compermise by at least
80% of the folks commenting on this list.  As I am sure others
will as well.  

  A side note.  If you are wondering if I am a very persistant
person, you are correct.  And I shall continue to be so for 
the rest of my days on this earth.  That is a key to sucessful
business and personal achievments.  I do not know quit unless
a reasonable compermise is achieved in these matters.



Scott Bradner wrote:
> 
> Jeff,
> 
>         This connection seems to be a persistent belief on your part
> in the face of at least two postings by Dave Crocker (the editor of the
> draft) saying that there is no connection.
>         To claim that the section you point out means that 60 day wait
> is related to the lottery is beyond me (& beyond the understanding of
> the person who put teh words on the electronic paper)
> 
> Scott

Regards,

-- 
Jeffrey A. Williams
DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng.
Information Eng. Group. 
Phone :972-447-1878
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com