[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fees
- Date: Sat, 28 Dec 1996 22:07:55 -0800
- From: Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.com>
- Subject: Re: Fees
At 5:10 PM -0800 12/28/96, Dave Crocker wrote:
> At 2:13 PM -0800 12/26/96, Karl Auerbach wrote:
> >Seems like a good use of some of that 30% being witheld by NSI.
>
> Why should folks interested in starting a commercial venture for
> name administration be subsidized?
Name one exisitng registry that has been set-up with it's own funds and
is self-sufficient. Even NSI doesn't qualify.
> Whether one likes or dislikes the particulars of NSF's activities
> in this regard, they very much ARE trying to move towards full
> privatization and commercial self-funding. The IAHC proposal is consistent
> with goal. Seeking cross-subsidization -- even from NSI -- would not be.
>
So this means the Shared-TLD code is going to self-funding too?
Regards,
Simon
--
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.
- References:
- Re: Fees
- From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@imc.org>