[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fees
Kent,
Please read below your comments.
Kent Crispin wrote:
>
> Perry E. Metzger allegedly said:
> >
> >
> > Kent Crispin writes:
> > > 3) the $20000 is presented as an arbitrary fixed figure, instead of
> > > being couched in terms of the requirements at hand.
> >
> > Please re-read the document more carefully. You will note the all
> > important indicator "[estimated]" next to the figure.
>
> I've read the draft several times. I'm familiar with the "all
> important indicator" you mentioned. That's not the point.
>
> The draft could just as well said "$XXXXX". It *will be* an arbitrary
> fixed figure, even if you have currently notated it as a variable.
>
> And it's really the "fixed" part that is the problem. A fixed fee
> gives you two problems -- 1) what do you do if it isn't enough, and
> 2) what do you do with the excess if it's too much.
You make a good point here. This should also be covered in the
"Final Draft". One suggestion I have is you could pool that
money and redestribute it back to the applicants equally each
quarter.
Regards,
>
> --
> Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited",
> kent@songbird.com,kc@llnl.gov the thief he kindly spoke...
> PGP fingerprint: 5A 16 DA 04 31 33 40 1E 87 DA 29 02 97 A3 46 2F
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng.
Information Eng. Group.
Phone :972-447-1878
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
- References:
- Re: Fees
- From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>