[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: An observation
- Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 15:14:08 -0800
- From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@imc.org>
- Subject: Re: An observation
At 2:48 PM -0800 12/30/96, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>Christopher Ambler writes:
>> Every time you see a .com in a TV commercial, it promotes the brand.
>
>Yes, but they don't run those commercials. NSI (the "they" in your
>comment) isn't doing any of the "brand development".
Let me stress this point further.
I'm perfectly willing to believe that there is brand equity with
.com. What I do NOT understand is attributing any of that development to
NSI. What is is that they have done to achieve this development, as
opposed to what the intertia of the net has done on its own?
d/
ps. we're having an academic discussion about brand development. this is
not NSI bashing (or supporting) but rather an attempt to understand some
recent market forces.
(read the last line, please)
----------------------------
Dave Crocker, Director +1 408 246 8253
Internet Mail Consortium (f) +1 408 249 6205
127 Segré Place dcrocker@imc.org
Santa Cruz, CA 95060 USA http://www.imc.org
Also: IAHC member, expressing strictly (or loosely) personal opinions