[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: use the force Luke...
- Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 18:25:28 -70400 (PST)
- From: bmanning@ISI.EDU (Bill Manning)
- Subject: Re: use the force Luke...
> > They apply to WIPO for the DNS lable: IBM.WIPO.INT.
> >
> > This has the cachet of being recognised as a trademark label
> > as seen by an accredited/recognised arbiter of trademarks.
>
> But the DNS isn't a database so why would a company want to register a
> trademark in the DNS in the first place? On the other hand, one of the
> stated purposes of the .INT TLD is to hold international databases so
> maybe this isn't such a bad idea. However, I would suggest that we leave
> WIPO.INT for the organization's normal usage and put the Madrid Marks
> database in either TM.INT or MM.INT.
>
Where's the :) ?
To clarify, one of the stated purposes of the INT zone is to
hold infrastructure databases (e.g. ip6.int. atma.int etc)
and international treaty orgs, not international databases.
Of course my half-baked idea is (imho) completely outside
the scope of the iahc anyway, as WIPO could turn the crank
on this idea all by themselves w/o any other authorization
and (hopefully) this LARGE red-herring (giant peruvian type)
would solve itself.
Oblig. :)
--
--bill