[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: An observation



On Mon, 23 Dec 1996, Thom Stark wrote:

> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 20:04:34 -0800 (PST)
> From: Thom Stark <thomst@netcom.com>
> 
> ... In
> particular, the constant referral to the wording of "the draft", as if
> it were holy writ, bothers me a great deal.  As a professional writer,
> I understand pride of authorship fairly well..and I also understand 
> that those writers who are not their own worst critics are too often
> incapable of separating their self-esteem from the aspects of their
> work which are deserving of criticism and correction.

But everyone out there is constantly trying to second guess and pin down a
committee that is supposed to be deliberative and still considering and
deciding things.  I think committee member references to the draft are
because the draft is about the only written statement of something the
committee has thus far agreed on. 

> ...
> 
> Thom Stark

Donald
=====================================================================
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd     +1 508-287-4877(tel)     dee@cybercash.com
   318 Acton Street        +1 508-371-7148(fax)     dee@world.std.com
Carlisle, MA 01741 USA     +1 703-620-4200(main office, Reston, VA)
http://www.cybercash.com           http://www.eff.org/blueribbon.html