[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: An observation
- Date: Wed, 1 Jan 1997 16:43:30 -0500 (EST)
- From: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee@cybercash.com>
- Subject: Re: An observation
On Mon, 23 Dec 1996, Thom Stark wrote:
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 20:04:34 -0800 (PST)
> From: Thom Stark <thomst@netcom.com>
>
> ... In
> particular, the constant referral to the wording of "the draft", as if
> it were holy writ, bothers me a great deal. As a professional writer,
> I understand pride of authorship fairly well..and I also understand
> that those writers who are not their own worst critics are too often
> incapable of separating their self-esteem from the aspects of their
> work which are deserving of criticism and correction.
But everyone out there is constantly trying to second guess and pin down a
committee that is supposed to be deliberative and still considering and
deciding things. I think committee member references to the draft are
because the draft is about the only written statement of something the
committee has thus far agreed on.
> ...
>
> Thom Stark
Donald
=====================================================================
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1 508-287-4877(tel) dee@cybercash.com
318 Acton Street +1 508-371-7148(fax) dee@world.std.com
Carlisle, MA 01741 USA +1 703-620-4200(main office, Reston, VA)
http://www.cybercash.com http://www.eff.org/blueribbon.html