[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fast Food Analogy
- Date: Thu, 2 Jan 1997 12:06:37 -0800
- From: Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.com>
- Subject: Re: Fast Food Analogy
At 11:12 AM -0500 1/2/97, Vince Wolodkin wrote:
> Christopher Ambler wrote:
> >
> > >Of course, if IANA had told them that they could as anything other than
> > >an experiment, then they would be. I think you would agree that IANA
> > >told them they could run new registries AS EXPERIMENTS.
> >
> Well, if that was the case, I could understand why you guys get so hot
> about all of this. I thought I had heard something about Bill Manning
> helping out with the language for AlterNIC to indicate that the whole
> thing was experimental. Am I mistaken?
>
Nope...
------------- Forwarded message -------------
From: "Bill Manning" <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
Message-Id: <199607240537.AA03486@zephyr.isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 22:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
To: newdom@iiia.org
Subject: Someone asked...
Resent-Sender: newdom-request@iiia.org
Precedence: list
>
> ... at what point do you think the line was overstepped?
>
> ....
> Intending to use it regardless?
> Accepting money for registrations?
>
These last two.
There should be, at a minimum IMHO, a signed
clause that states something like:
"Use of this domain is strictly experimental and as such
has the following attributes:
-It is not visable to a majority of the Internet
-It may go away or be superceded at any time by
an offically delegated domain that may or may not
subsume any entries in this experimental domain.
-An offically delegated domain may be run by a different
registry with a completly different set of registration
rules.
-Any monies collected for creation of entries in
this experimental domain are non-refundable.
Client is aware of these constraints and agrees to indemnify and
hold harmless the experimental registry."
--
--bill
----------End Of Forwarded message ----------
Regards,
Simon
--
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.