[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Consensus Development
- Date: Fri, 03 Jan 1997 03:50:05 +0000
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Subject: Re: Consensus Development
Kent,
Kent Crispin wrote:
>
> Jeff Williams allegedly said:
> >
>
> [...]
>
> > > Well, no: it traditionally refers to an election with a simple
> > > majority. If 50% plus 1 person vote yea, the measure is passed.
> >
> > And that represents a consensus in my estimation, unless my math
> > is bad.
>
> I don't know about your math, but your understanding of the meaning
> of the word "consensus" is off the mark. From my dictionary:
>
> "consensus n. general agreement in opinion."
>
> 50% + 1 person describes general *disagreement*.
I suppose that depends on your perspective. To me if the "Majority"
supports a particular conclusion or possition, than you have a general
BROAD consensus.
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng.
Information Eng. Group.
Phone :972-447-1878
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com