[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Consensus Development
- Date: Fri, 3 Jan 1997 02:42:33 -0800 (PST)
- From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
- Subject: Re: Consensus Development
Jeff Williams allegedly said:
>
[...]
> > Well, no: it traditionally refers to an election with a simple
> > majority. If 50% plus 1 person vote yea, the measure is passed.
>
> And that represents a consensus in my estimation, unless my math
> is bad.
I don't know about your math, but your understanding of the meaning
of the word "consensus" is off the mark. From my dictionary:
"consensus n. general agreement in opinion."
50% + 1 person describes general *disagreement*.
--
Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited",
kent@songbird.com,kc@llnl.gov the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint: 5A 16 DA 04 31 33 40 1E 87 DA 29 02 97 A3 46 2F